Thread:Goldenglory4life/@comment-39890448-20200311210418/@comment-31513065-20200312001211

Bignatebaseball wrote: LordNour wrote: Bignatebaseball wrote: LordNour wrote: ZachOWott wrote: PET, like we have both said many times, it does not matter whether or not you "didn't know what you were thinking" or if you still would have won anyway. You still tried to do it at the time, which is something a bureaucrat should not do. We have no reason to trust you in leading a community if you tried to lie to everyone. I know your response to this will be that you nulled them or that you changed your mind or whatever, but the point is that you thought it would be a good idea at some point in time, not what you think now. Look at Henry and Sway. They have not tried to lie to the community. Sway has no alts and Henry has one alt which he has never used for bad that everyone knows about already. I am positive that neither of them would ever do what you tried to do, making them both better candidates for bureaucrat among other things.

There's no point in arguing. A lot of this community, Golden, Fancy, etc. act like you're the best person ever and that you could never do anything wrong, but the rest of us have realized that that's not true and you aren't the likable trustworthy person we previously thought. (But actually I joined during the bureaucrat debates so I never really thought of you like that tbh) He still repented nontheless by admitting to the entire community his mistake. Had he really not been trustworthy, he would've at least tried to deny it, or even cover it up, but instead he expressed humility by him, the bureaucrat, coming out and admitting that he used those alts which, regardless, did not aid him in any way in earning this position! He made a bad decision and he reversed it.

There's really no point in arguing over the results of a poll which was held 5 months ago. PET won, and since then, the wiki has largely been in good hands. And now, Zach, we don't think that PET is completely immune towards mistakes, hence why we are having this debate right now, but punishing him over something which he has done 5 MONTHS ago, which did not help in any way, and prompted him to go out as the bureaucrat in front of the entire wiki and apologize is utterly ridiculous. Thats like saying if someone commited a murder five months ago that he shouldn't have a punishment A murder is not reversible, unlike this decision of his. Also, comparing this to a MURDER is a tad bit too drastic. My point is that this poll's results are set in stone, PET has won. Period. There's really no point in going out now and further calling him out over something which he has publicly apologized for and reversed so that it doesn't give him an unfair advantage. Ok fine something a little less drastic say ur kid broke a window and the you find out a 5 months later that it was him hes not gonna go unpunished But in this case, the kid fixed the window in advance. Like I said, stop cherry-picking arguments that make me look worse than needed.