Should Awqua be blocked for a Month?

Introduction
As some of you may have noticed, Awqua’s behavior has gotten out of hand lately. His actions include but are not limited to: spam pinging a FANDOM staff member, edit spamming several times, lying about users, blatantly false accusations to stir trouble, and several more. This calls the question: should Awqua be blocked for an extended period of time (e.g. 1 month, 2 months)? Below is a petition that wiki users can sign, in order to convince admins to block him.

Update
Awqua is now terminated.

For The Ban
Henry_Hudson 03:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC) (Note: I believe a 1 week block would be more appropriate)

ObiWanKenobiJesus (talk) (Primarily for attempting to get TheYounglings ban nothing to do with his accusations against me) note: 2 months more appropriate (ignoring edit spam warnings, attempting to get TheYounglings banned, swearing many many times in serious ways, previously banned, no need to continue the list)

Toad: he definitely needs to be dealt with, I spoke to him yesterday and he said he would improve, and he clearly has not. He has been contributing nothing but negativity over the last few weeks, so why should he be allowed to continue? I would say a ban of 2-4 weeks would be appropriate

31 (talk) 08:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Darth Gromit (talk) 13:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

ItsP-dog (User_talk:ItsP-dog) 13:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Hobbes the dragon (Message Wall | Contributions) 4:20, 18 December UTC

I think that a 1 month block would be reasonable.

Palm boi Trying to get my personal information

Against The Ban
ZachOWott (talk) 12:26, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Arcane