Thread:Goldenglory4life/@comment-39890448-20200311210418/@comment-31513065-20200311233533

Bignatebaseball wrote: LordNour wrote: Honestly, I don't see the correlation between PET and PL's actions. PET, unlike PL, did not try to deny it and owned up to it immediately, and still won nontheless. Second, unlike PL, who was a regular instigator of many debacles and arguments, I think PET is the one trying to defend his well-deserved rank from something that has happened nearly half a year ago which he has made up for if not in that poll with his actions as bureaucrat. The argument that him adding bots shows that he's not a good bureaucrat is only valid if he tried to deny it, which he did not. Instead, he confirmed that he is a good leader by displaying humility and integrity after admitting his mistake to the entire wiki and apologizing for it. PL, on the other hand would've fought tooth and nail to deny your accusations.

Comparing PET to PL is simply ludicrous. He didnt own up to it immediately. It took him 5 months to admit he used alts. And that was only because we confronted him about it I owned up to it when I nulled the votes AND provided EXTRA compensation to my opponent. But alas, nothing is ever enough for the wiki apparently.