Community Activity:Should we have two Bureaucrats

Put your opinions down below.

Rules
These will be order by priority. Admins may take action on any violators.
 * You cannot respond to anyone else's opinions.
 * You cannot make sentences irrelevant to the topic.
 * You cannot go against anyone on this page.
 * You cannot change anyone's sentences.

Positive Elixir Trade
I think that we should not have two Bureaucrats because our current staff is enough to handle anything that comes our way. We have FOUR admins already. Why should we change our balance of power if nothing bad is coming out of it?

P-dog
We have 4 admins, and a great bureaucrat already. Why would we need a new one? PET is equal to more than 3. Without him, the wiki would fall apart, and I don't think we could trust anyone else with this position.

GG4L
I think we should because #1. You PET won't get as much pressure. #2. More CSS programs. 3. PET can be less active so he can have more free time. What’s the point of having so many admins?

Bignatebaseball
I think we should have two because that way if something happens to one of them the other can fill in while they're gone. Also there could be a second opinion

Zach
I think there should be two because they can work together to make important decisions and make the wiki a better place. I also think it's important to have two instead of one because then they can contradict each other's opinions and represent the community more.

Neptune
I think we should because of multiple reasons.

1.

the wiki has had two in the past, why not now. the wiki users number hasnt really changed (edited)

2.

It would be good to have a back-up leader

3.

If one is currently inactive, the other can take over forn a while

4.

Designsion making would be much easier

5.

We could make less mistakes, like for example when we made pl admin, that was a mistake. But with two buerucats, we could avoid something similar in the future.