Community Activity:Rating UCP “Features”

Garf here with yet, another community survey!

Today, we will be rating UCP “features”

Pretty self explanatory. I have categories and you gotta rate em

Removal of the WikiActivity, and in with Recent Changes!
garf - 0/10- recent changes are a lot more laggy and confusing

yoda 0/10

Zach - 0/10

Eddie - 1/10 My least favorite part of this update. It's confusing and dumb, like why are social activity and image activity separate?

Removal of Chat
garf - 0/10- chat was a way to communicate and they removed it

Swasimcool - 0/10.

yoda 0/10

Zach - 5/10 - It was kinda fun at the end but just use discord; it's not a big deal.

Eddie 5/10 I don't hate this change but I would have liked it if they have keep it.

Slower FANDOM experience
Garf - 0/10- stupid, it’s slow and it’s dumb

Swasimcool N/A

Zach - 5/10 - The only really slow thing I've experienced is opening visual editor but it's not that bad.

Eddie 6/10

Poopy Templates
Garf - 4/10- stupid template change

Swasimcool - 5/10

Eddie NA/10

Looking at profiles
garf - 1/10- it’s an eyesore

Swasimcool - 8/10

Zach - 8/10 - Not bad, only things I would suggest is to add back edit count and join date.

Eddie - 7/10

Newer and “better” editing experience
garf - 3/10 it’s better

Swasimcool - 7/10

Zach - 8/10 - This is the thing I have the biggest opinion on. The visual difference is big; I am not against it, but it will take getting used to. I liked how it looked before, but this change makes things more compact. Visual editor is not my favorite thing anyway and it takes a bit to load now. The visual changes for the source editor will also take getting used to, but I think it is changed for the better. The new preview option, "show changes", is much better than before because you can see it while editing now. They also added an "edit source" option next to headings which is nice. The only problem is some slight oversights/bugs with the source editor, but fandom is very reliable; I have spoken to their support and they will be fixing the problems I found.

Eddie 6/10 It's not that bad but like Zach said it will take a while to get used too.

The name
Garf- 2/10- stupid name

Swasimcool - 3/10

Zach - I don't know how to rate this. The name makes sense for what it does.

Eddie It sounds like "You see pee".

Broken edits
garf - 0/10 edits I made on templates and stuff didn’t register through. I made 2 edits (not including templates and stuff). made a page and this one and it shows up as “3 edits” in the community tab.

Swasimcool - 3/10

Zach - Rating something with "broken" in the name is redundant. This issue is very minor and fixes itself in a day or two of it occurring.

Eddie NA/10 Ngl it's funny seeing people freak out when they see they "lost" their edits.

Removal of polls on pages (not in discussions)
garf- 4/10- didn’t use

Swasimcool - 5/10

Zach - 4/10 - I never used it, but it was a cool feature specifically for other wikis.

Eddie 5/10 It was only used on a very small about of pages here so it's not a huge loss.

badges names changed
yoda 1/10

Zach - Didn't know this existed.

Eddie 3/10

Just being here (overall score)
garf- 0/10- stupid UCP.

Swasimcool - 6/10

yoda- 5/10

Zach - 6/10 was my average out of these categories, but I would say it's an 8/10. Not too bad, just will take some getting used to and minor bug fixes.

Eddie 6/10